Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4852 13
Original file (NR4852 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 8 COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN
Docket No.NR04852-13
2 December 2013

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

 

Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command/Survivor Benefit Plan Program

Manager Casualty Assistance (PERS-13}) memo of
18 Sept 2013
(3) DD Form 214 (20 Nov 2001 - 30 Sept 2002)
Correction to DD Form 214

Marriage Certificate btwng and

   

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner
submitted a timely written request for Reserve Component

an Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage for his spouse maa

at the full base amount within one year of their
marriage on

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and
George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 12 November 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
Docket No.NR04852-13

b. Fee eee i gl (Petitioner) transferred to
the retired list without pay, during June 2000. He was single
at that time and had no eligible beneficiaries for enrollment in
the RCSBP program.

c. Petitioner was activated to active duty in November
2001, immediately following the September 11, 2001 attacks,
enclosures (3) and (4).

a. Prior to his deployment, Petitioner married i
: } enclosure (5). He claims that he
only had three weeks to take care of all of his personal affairs
prior to the mobilization with a unit that he was not familiar
with and did not know that he had to enroll his new spouse for
RCSBP coverage.

e. Additionally, Petitioner notes that while on activated,
he was unaware of any open enrollment seasons to enroll his
spouse. He was finally released from the Reserves in September
2012, after 33 years of service.

f. By enclosure (2), NPC/SBP Manager recommended that no
relief be granted, stating that the statutory failing ddéadline
has expired. That Petitioner had one year from the date of his
marriage to elect spousal coverage oF during an open enrollment
season and failed to do so.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence in the record,
the Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. The Board found that the following factors militated in
favor of relief: Petitioner was not married at the original
time he first transferred to retired list and was not eligible
for RCSBP enrollment since he did not have any eligible
dependents. Additionally, the Board recognized that Petitioner
did not submit an election within one year from the date of his
marriage as required by applicable law. However in light of the
extenuating circumstances of the events of September 11, 2001,
where he was activated to active duty, the Board understood that
he may not have had the time or knowledge to enroil his new
spouse in the RCSBP program. Finally, the Board also understood
and carefully considered the comments made in enclosure (2),
that Petitioner could have enrolled his spouse during the one
year of their marriage or during one of the open enrollment
seasons. However, balancing the factors that militate in favor
Docket No.NR04852-13

of relief against those that militate against, the Board finds
that, as an exception to policy, Petitioner’s request should be
granted favorable action.

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
to show that:

a. Petitioner executed a timely written request for
enrollment in RCSBP coverage, at the full base amount, naming
as the sole beneficiary. The request was
received by cognizant authority and became effective 18 November

2001, the day following the date of marriage.

b. Petitioner is responsible for all RCSBP premiums costs
that will be calculated into his RCSBP payments at the time he
reaches age 60. There is no waiver authorized.

Cc. That a copy of the Report of Proceedings, be filed in
the Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(¢c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s

proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Drumset Lon

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRONTE I. MONTGOMERY
Recorder Acting Recorder
a The foregoing action of the Board is submitted for your

review and action.

» dei

Fxyecutive Director

Ad [ook 12/9115

ReyaBERPLANGOBEE=Ove*:

Assistant General Counsel

(Manpower and Reserve Affairs) 3
1000 Navy Pentagon, Rm 4D548

Washington, DC 20359-1000

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5444 14

    Original file (NR5444 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter 'referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from child only to- spouse and child coverage. k. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that the request has no merit and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4533 14

    Original file (NR4533 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, as of 3 January 2005, you have been enrolled in an immediate RC-SBP annuity for your spouse and child{ren).” See ‘enclosure (7). They notified Petitioner that as of 3 January 2005, he had been enrolled in the RCSBP under the spouse and child category with immediate (Option C) coverage. b. Petitioner is responsible for future unpaid RCSBP costs (Petitioner will be eligible for retire pay on or about 20 April 2021) that would have been deducted if he enrolled at the time of his Marriage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004269

    Original file (20130004269.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies: * DD Form 2656-6, dated 19 February 2013 * a State of Colorado Marriage License and Marriage Certificate CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. All of these open enrollment seasons were extensively publicized in Army Echoes to ensure all retirees were informed of their existence and also in the Army Times. He was authorized up to 1 year from the date of marriage to enroll his spouse and stepchildren in the RCSBP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015598

    Original file (20130015598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 2656-9 (SBP and RCSBP Open Enrollment Election), dated 25 January 2006, shows he elected spouse-only coverage. He provided a letter from DFAS, dated 12 July 2013, which states: * their records indicate he elected RCSBP child coverage on his DD Form 1883 on 7 February 1988 * at that time he was not married * on his original DD Form 2656 he elected SBP for his spouse and he indicated his marriage occurred on 19 May 1989 * there is a 1-year window of eligibility * notification, along...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007406

    Original file (20140007406.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he completed a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) at the time he received his Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter). The applicant contends, in effect, that his military records should be corrected to show he elected RCSBP coverage for his spouse within a year of their marriage. In 2003, when he married, he had a 1-year period in which to submit an RCSBP election to provide coverage for his spouse.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006044

    Original file (20130006044.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, his records be corrected to show he added his spouse to his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) and SBP election within one year of their marriage. The applicant states he submitted a beneficiary change to reflect his spouse after his marriage on 20 August 1999, and prior to his retirement on 17 December 2012. The applicant retired from the U.S. Army Reserve and was placed on the retired list on 17 December 2012, in the rank of CW2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11104-09

    Original file (11104-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002317

    Original file (20140002317.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show he elected Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage for his spouse. The applicant contends, in effect, that his military records should be corrected to show he elected RCSBP coverage for his spouse within a year of their marriage. In 1998, when the applicant married, he had a 1-year period in which to submit an RCSBP election to provide coverage for his spouse.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008091

    Original file (20140008091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's records to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse coverage. The denial letter states: * by law, the FSM had 1 year from the date of marriage (23 April 2005) to elect coverage for his spouse * the FSM never made an election for spouse coverage * the applicant's request for payment must be denied 8. The evidence shows the FSM was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2288 13

    Original file (NR2288 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5 COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO2288-13 4 December 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Navy Personnel Command/Survivor Benefit Plan Program Manager Casualty Assistance (PERS-13} memo of ‘Meath Certificate in case of ay